{"id":9600,"date":"2019-06-18T16:23:58","date_gmt":"2019-06-18T22:23:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/conciencianacional.org\/?p=9600"},"modified":"2019-06-20T17:26:50","modified_gmt":"2019-06-20T23:26:50","slug":"sinaloa-legisla-en-favor-del-matrimonio-natural","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/?p=9600","title":{"rendered":"\u00a1Sinaloa legisla en favor del matrimonio natural!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>El d\u00eda de hoy, 18 de junio, durante la sesi\u00f3n del Congreso del Estado de Sinaloa se someti\u00f3 a votaci\u00f3n el dictamen de reforma a los art\u00edculos\u00a040 y 165 del C\u00f3digo Familiar sobre \u00abmatrimonio igualitario\u00bb en el estado, por resoluci\u00f3n de la Suprema Corta de Justicia.<\/p>\n<p>Con una votaci\u00f3n de 18 a favor y 20 en contra, \u00e9sta tarde, los\u00a0diputados locales de la 63 Legislatura <strong>no aprobaron<\/strong> la iniciativa que reformar\u00eda los art\u00edculos en la Constituci\u00f3n local respecto a la definici\u00f3n del matrimonio como la uni\u00f3n de un hombre y una mujer.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-9604 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/conciencianacional.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/GAYS_CONGRESO-267737-640x427.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"427\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/GAYS_CONGRESO-267737-640x427.jpg 640w, https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/GAYS_CONGRESO-267737-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/GAYS_CONGRESO-267737-1280x853.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/GAYS_CONGRESO-267737.jpg 1404w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>La diputada Margarita Inzunza se posicion\u00f3 en contra de las reformas y afirm\u00f3 que no aceptaba \u201cque se desvirt\u00fae el concepto de familia (\u2026), la familia natural es la base de nuestra sociedad\u201d; por su parte el diputado\u00a0Jorge Iv\u00e1n Villalobos sostuvo que son \u00abun partido humanista, por lo que rechazamos cualquier discriminaci\u00f3n por g\u00e9nero (\u2026), pero defendemos ante todo el inter\u00e9s superior de la familia\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Diputados, junto con la sociedad asistente, celebraron la votaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-9603 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/conciencianacional.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/no_aprueban_matrimonio_igualitario_en_el_congreso_de_sinaloa_x4x_2.jpeg_1523629909-640x428.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"428\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/no_aprueban_matrimonio_igualitario_en_el_congreso_de_sinaloa_x4x_2.jpeg_1523629909-640x428.jpeg 640w, https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/no_aprueban_matrimonio_igualitario_en_el_congreso_de_sinaloa_x4x_2.jpeg_1523629909.jpeg 726w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>El Consejo Interreligioso del Estado de Sinaloa estuvo presente durante la sesi\u00f3n para mostrar su apoyo y\u00a0 mantener su postura sobre la defensa del matrimonio natural y la familia.<\/p>\n<div class=\"epyt-video-wrapper\">\n<div  id=\"_ytid_32829\"  width=\"640\" height=\"360\"  data-origwidth=\"640\" data-origheight=\"360\" data-facadesrc=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/fV6de9c7lgQ?enablejsapi=1&#038;autoplay=0&#038;cc_load_policy=0&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;loop=0&#038;fs=1&#038;playsinline=0&#038;controls=1&#038;disablekb=0&#038;color=red&#038;cc_lang_pref=&#038;rel=0&#038;autohide=2&#038;theme=dark&#038;\" class=\"__youtube_prefs__ epyt-facade epyt-is-override  no-lazyload\" data-epautoplay=\"1\" ><img decoding=\"async\" data-spai-excluded=\"true\" class=\"epyt-facade-poster skip-lazy\" loading=\"lazy\"  alt=\"YouTube player\"  src=\"https:\/\/i.ytimg.com\/vi\/fV6de9c7lgQ\/maxresdefault.jpg\"  \/><button class=\"epyt-facade-play\" aria-label=\"Play\"><svg data-no-lazy=\"1\" height=\"100%\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 68 48\" width=\"100%\"><path class=\"ytp-large-play-button-bg\" d=\"M66.52,7.74c-0.78-2.93-2.49-5.41-5.42-6.19C55.79,.13,34,0,34,0S12.21,.13,6.9,1.55 C3.97,2.33,2.27,4.81,1.48,7.74C0.06,13.05,0,24,0,24s0.06,10.95,1.48,16.26c0.78,2.93,2.49,5.41,5.42,6.19 C12.21,47.87,34,48,34,48s21.79-0.13,27.1-1.55c2.93-0.78,4.64-3.26,5.42-6.19C67.94,34.95,68,24,68,24S67.94,13.05,66.52,7.74z\" fill=\"#f00\"><\/path><path d=\"M 45,24 27,14 27,34\" fill=\"#fff\"><\/path><\/svg><\/button><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Fuente: Sala de Prensa Conciencia Nacional<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El d\u00eda de hoy, 18 de junio, durante la sesi\u00f3n del Congreso del Estado de Sinaloa se someti\u00f3 a votaci\u00f3n el dictamen de reforma a los art\u00edculos\u00a040 y 165 del C\u00f3digo Familiar sobre \u00abmatrimonio igualitario\u00bb en el estado, por resoluci\u00f3n de la Suprema Corta de Justicia. Con una votaci\u00f3n de 18 a favor y 20 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":9601,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[81,82,83,862],"tags":[360,471,86,101],"class_list":["post-9600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-derechos-humanos","category-nacional","category-noticias","category-prensa-cnlr","tag-cnlr","tag-comsejo-interreligioso","tag-libertad-religiosa","tag-matrimonio"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9600"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9600\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9665,"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9600\/revisions\/9665"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/9601"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/observatoriolibertadreligiosa.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}